PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Names in the records

Each spelling a register uses for this entity, and the method that tied it here. A name is never the identity; a similar name is never a match.

What the records establish

• PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP: 8 records of "reported donation to" between 30 September 2021 and 31 March 2026, £440,059 in total where a figure is published.
• PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP: 3 records of "contract awarded to this supplier" between 26 January 2026 and 1 August 2026, £913,078 in total where a figure is published.

What Civometry computed from these records

Each item below is a CALCULATION: two or more register rows that name the same company, put side by side. The rows are linked at the end of each item. Nothing here is a finding.

1. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 3 donations totalling £230,060 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £913,078, by NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED and FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

   The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

2. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 3 donations totalling £131,582 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £913,078, by NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED and FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

   The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

3. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 2 donations totalling £78,417 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Liberal Democrats; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £913,078, by NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED and FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

   The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

4. The records establish: on 31 March 2026 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £91,214 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 1 August 2026 FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED published an award to the same company of External Audit Services (£710,000). The two dates are 123 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

   The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

5. The records establish: on 18 December 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £87,381 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 1 August 2026 FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED published an award to the same company of External Audit Services (£710,000). The two dates are 226 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

   The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

6. The records establish: on 30 September 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £51,465 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 1 August 2026 FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED published an award to the same company of External Audit Services (£710,000). The two dates are 305 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

   The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

7. The records establish: on 31 March 2026 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £91,214 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 9 July 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1341 - Project Oracle - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£104,078). The two dates are 100 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

   The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

8. The records establish: on 18 December 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £87,381 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 9 July 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1341 - Project Oracle - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£104,078). The two dates are 203 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

   The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

9. The records establish: on 30 September 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £51,465 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 9 July 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1341 - Project Oracle - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£104,078). The two dates are 282 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

   The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

10. The records establish: on 31 March 2026 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £91,214 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 26 January 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1155 - Project Supercharge - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£99,000). The two dates are 64 days apart, the award first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

11. The records establish: on 18 December 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £87,381 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 26 January 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1155 - Project Supercharge - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£99,000). The two dates are 39 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

12. The records establish: on 30 September 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £51,465 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 26 January 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1155 - Project Supercharge - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£99,000). The two dates are 118 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

What this does not establish

The records above establish that PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP and each entity named appear together in an official register, in the relationship that register records, on the date it records. They do not establish why any donation was made, why any contract was awarded, whether any one record was known to the people behind another, or that any record caused another. No causal inference is made on this page, and nothing here is a finding of any kind against anyone. A reported donation is a lawful, reported transaction; a contract award is a published notice; a seat is a seat.

The same name elsewhere in the records

A register spells another entry exactly as it spells this one. The graph keeps them apart because no register says they are the same, and a shared name is not evidence that they are.

• PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP — Organisation, Contracts Finder, as “PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP”
• PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP — Donor, Electoral Commission, as “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”
• PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP — Organisation, Contracts Finder, as “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”
• PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP — Organisation, Find a Tender, as “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”